Actually fubaraoul, no one is running around claiming their imaginary friends are real. Please demonstrate to me where such claims were present and how it relates to what I have admonished that you do.
Secondly, the idiom "Get a grip" that I used is defined as the following: 1) control oneself, 2) cool their temper.
Telling me to "go fuck myself" and dubbing me a "motherfucker" will conduce to an elimination of your rights to access the correct YouTube account; in addition, such is not indicative of control or cool temper, which you alleged you had, despite ensuingly calling me "dipshit."
You are a walking paradox.
Diversion - the act of diverting or turning aside, as from a course or purpose.
The accurate identification of the purpose of the specified comment from you is diversion and comments of your ilk spring from doofiness; you can disagree with me but not with the definitions.
Doofiness - I refer you to the number four definition in this link: urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=doofiness
Pay particular attention to the following excerpt from the meaning of "doofy" in the above link: "Some suffer from prolonged or lifetime doofiness, such as individuals with Asperger's syndrome."
Hi fubaraoul. You speak of "matter of fact" yet you appear to be nescient of the nature of truth, that it is gentle, vulnerable, beautiful, radiant, revealing, and oh yes, cordial. Your comportment towards others has been the antipodal of that which is a "matter of fact" and your insults directed at others have been indicative of a cuss that is an enemy of truth.
There is no fact in the reprehensibility of sincere responses as your misconception of the sincerity is what is reprehensible.
Yes, I did use the term "candor" in my statement to you, why do you ask the obvious, isn't it obvious? Second, about your remonstration that in order for one to use that word in the relation of the context as I did they would have to be ignorant of what the Bible says, well, hmm; either you don't know what candor means or you are tacitly conceding that you indeed cannot permit any candor, thus answering, though with circumlocution, my question, thanks.
Additionally, we are not talking about a belief, we are talking about the nature of the veracity of a collection of books sewn together to form one book, the Bible.
It is a statement that is entirely empty, but I didn't expect you to comprehend it anyway so, let me explain specially for you. A statement that is empty contains no substance that entails evidence for the assumed reality of something, in this case, the contents of the aggregate total of books that comprise the Bible.
Also, what or who defines reality?
I'd love to hear your response to something I have said and I am thankful that you did not resort to anything even approximating a personal attack.
And, that is also why some dictionaries define the term "atheism" as "the doctrine that there is no God."
God definition: the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.
Perhaps it would be wise to classify god in lowercase and god in uppercase in different categories.
You have starkly failed to substantiate your claim. In addition you were blind to your own claim, it seems, because you are trying to prove something you actually never said. I don't have time toying around with you lightweight intellectuals with [accompanying] nasty demeanors and extremely deficit ken of practically anything you talk about.
Adieus delusional atheists, and remember that is an opinion I am entitled to in the same way you are.
Ok, well play nice I'm out. Adeus. Btw, I'm not an atheist, I lied, atheism is in my opinion delusional, you can disagree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
And now you are claiming I am committing deception, is that what I am to understand from your last sentence?
No comments:
Post a Comment